<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/</link>
	<description>All about 3D CAD, Design, Engineering, Modeling, Animation &#38; Simulation Resources, Tutorial, Tips &#38; Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maliki</title>
		<link>http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Maliki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testsite.shirokage.com/?p=4#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi Kakeru. I think nobody can exactly answer it yes or no coz its depend on individual skill and which area you want to use the CAD (e.g. use for product design or industrial design, type of industries etc). In general use, personally I&#039;d like to line-up these 3 CADs as follow (from easy to difficult) (1)Solidworks (2)Pro-E (3)CATIA.
For the AutoCAD, I&#039;ve no much experience about it but I think it has great supports from architecture/construction industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kakeru. I think nobody can exactly answer it yes or no coz its depend on individual skill and which area you want to use the CAD (e.g. use for product design or industrial design, type of industries etc). In general use, personally I&#8217;d like to line-up these 3 CADs as follow (from easy to difficult) (1)Solidworks (2)Pro-E (3)CATIA.<br />
For the AutoCAD, I&#8217;ve no much experience about it but I think it has great supports from architecture/construction industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kakeru</title>
		<link>http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>kakeru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testsite.shirokage.com/?p=4#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Pro-E user, designing for office workstation. Don&#039;t have any experience related to use the other design software like CATIA or SolidWorks, except AutoCAD. My friend said that the other software is easier compared to Pro-E... Is it true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Pro-E user, designing for office workstation. Don&#8217;t have any experience related to use the other design software like CATIA or SolidWorks, except AutoCAD. My friend said that the other software is easier compared to Pro-E&#8230; Is it true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maliki</title>
		<link>http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Maliki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testsite.shirokage.com/?p=4#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi Fauzi! Thanks for visited my blog. I&#039;m designing Hi-Fi product... CATIA... wow! its great CAD especially for handling thousands of parts in big assembly.. the mainstream CAD system for automotive &amp; aeronautical industries.. am I right? But, its not so user friendly compared to it&#039;s sibling, Solidworks (just my personal thought coz I&#039;ve tried to learn CATIA V5R17 before, but can&#039;t caught up).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fauzi! Thanks for visited my blog. I&#8217;m designing Hi-Fi product&#8230; CATIA&#8230; wow! its great CAD especially for handling thousands of parts in big assembly.. the mainstream CAD system for automotive &#038; aeronautical industries.. am I right? But, its not so user friendly compared to it&#8217;s sibling, Solidworks (just my personal thought coz I&#8217;ve tried to learn CATIA V5R17 before, but can&#8217;t caught up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fauzi</title>
		<link>http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Fauzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testsite.shirokage.com/?p=4#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi..which company you&#039;re from. I&#039;m a CATIA V5 user designing automotive parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi..which company you&#8217;re from. I&#8217;m a CATIA V5 user designing automotive parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maliki</title>
		<link>http://www.3dexpose.net/3d-world/design_engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Maliki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testsite.shirokage.com/?p=4#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kakeru.
This year I&#039;m reaching a decade mark of experience in using pro-e. I&#039;m really want to share my experience to others but dunno how to start it... it&#039;s very much different between &quot;using&quot; and &quot;teaching&quot;. That&#039;s why I&#039;m blogging this topic... very lazy &amp; slow, though :) btw, thanks for the comment.. its burn my spirit to get along...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kakeru.<br />
This year I&#8217;m reaching a decade mark of experience in using pro-e. I&#8217;m really want to share my experience to others but dunno how to start it&#8230; it&#8217;s very much different between &#8220;using&#8221; and &#8220;teaching&#8221;. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m blogging this topic&#8230; very lazy &#038; slow, though :) btw, thanks for the comment.. its burn my spirit to get along&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
